A Message from Consumer Action

Consumer Action's MoneyWi$e educational materials have moved to our Managing Money Project website. Here you may view, download and order bulk copies of the MoneyWi$e materials. Please make a note of the Managing Money Project address— www.managing-money.org —and add it to your address book.

Expression Hair Design et al. v NY AG Schneiderman

An amicus filing Consumer Action participated in (Expression Hair Design et al. v NY AG Schneiderman) went before the U.S. Supreme Court at the end of 2016. Consumer Action and other advocates supported the merchants’ first amendment free speech rights to inform consumers of the actual costs of credit transactions, arguing that the extra cost of credit card purchases is unknowingly born by those who do not use credit. New York retailers are allowed to charge separate prices for cash and credit card customers but can’t refer to the price difference as a “credit card surcharge.” The Supreme Court returned the case for reconsideration to the U.S. Court of Appeals (Second circuit). We continued our amicus support in 2017 when the case was returned to the Appellate court to be decided based on free speech, rather than pricing.


Quick Menu

Support Consumer Action

Support Consumer

Join Our Email List

Optional Member Code
Facebook FTwitter T

MoneyWise Modules

Managing Money Topics

Help Desk